Agentic delivery system
I designed a specification-driven workflow that keeps approved
intent separate from production code. Agents draft and analyse;
people steer, review and approve.
Autonomy dial
How far should the agent go?
Agent
Draft specifications, plans or code
Human
Edit and approve every change
There is no “just trust the model” setting.
-
01
Frame the work
Each story begins with scope, acceptance criteria and a
risk-based level that sets the evidence required.
-
02
Specify and plan
Role-specific agents draft the specification, close material
gaps, propose the technical approach and break it into tasks.
-
03
Check before coding
Read-only analysis tests the requirements, plan and tasks for
drift before cross-functional review.
-
04
Build from an approved baseline
Implementation starts after review. Contract, security,
accessibility and test gates protect the agreed intent.
Agents handled
Drafting, consistency analysis, task breakdown and
implementation against approved specifications.
People owned
Scope, trade-offs, architecture decisions, verification and
merge approval.
About 25% of the estimate
for the Azure design and setup work using this agentic workflow.